Skip to main content
i have always been an "individualist". i advocate rights of a person as an individual, not on race, religion, sex, nationality, representation etc.. but what's on my mind now, myt sound lyk an exception..though its not.

a long time back i had read this article in the newspaper it was this insight into future kind of thing. i don remember much of the things..but broadly it was about predicting how the world with cloning would be. how it would be pocble merely for the females to take over the reproduction, n males would become irrelevant in the society( in a biological perspective). somewher ther was this mention...that there are no males....there are only "superfemales"( he he he..)

so our society now divides into females n superfemales...guys please note!!!

a woman is "a world" in herself..cos she holds the keys to the world that will be tomorrow. it may b possible to have a world devoid of men, but not without women. men world over need to realise this. its not about proving them down..its not about superiority.....its about respect.

do we, women, get the respect we deserve? each person has his own dignity, u do , n so do I; guys hav n so do gals.

living in this world of today where being moral is not one of the " most coolest " thing to do.. i think i m not the only person wondering!!!
Labels:

Comments

Anonymous said…
how true..it's not about superiority, it's about respect..usually women are "objects"..either to be shown off, or to be owned and commanded..and these thought are not old and outdated..they apply as much to my generation as they did to the previous
October 19, 2007 at 9:23 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Damsel in Distress Syndrome

Many years ago, a male friend quoted, “a girl/woman in a relationship is somehow more attractive to other guys”.  I didn’t really give a thought to it then, it could have been well merely his opinion. But what with guys liking girls who are already with someone else (and vice versa) I thought it wasn’t as simple as that. At a broader, abstract level, we as social creatures, seek conformity in our actions, a kind of acceptance. We are more willing to conform to something that has been already accepted. More than often we conform to social codes, rules, without questioning them because they already have some acceptance for them. We tend to believe that anything that has been accepted should be worth accepting. The other way of looking at it, and this one’s a personal favourite, is the Damsel-in-Distress Syndrome. Okay, there’s no such syndrome really, and I came up with the name, but it fits. So a couple of years ago, I had this friend who thought a girl was driving him nut...
1 comment
Read more
अजुन माझे चुकले - माकले शब्द तुला टोचत असतील सावलीमध्ये कधी चुकून क्षण ओले भिजवत असतील पाउस म्हणून , वेड्या मनाची समजूत ही , तू घालत असशील मी नसले तरी कधी , चोरून, स्वप्न माझी पाहत असशील नसेन मी , पण हरवलेली प्रीत माझी खरी आहे एक डाव फसला , म्हणून आयुष्यभराची दूरी आहे
Post a Comment
Read more

smoke off yer life

Its been some time since my last post…..but I was preoccupied with other matters… Back to ma writin What is the difference between addiction n habit…if any!! The first thing that I turned to for an answer was a dictionary! In the GREAT DICTIONARY (no adjective, the dictionary I refer is itself called the GREAT DICTIONARY…nt oxford, m a bit unorthodox) i found this: ADDICTED is defined as being physically dependant on a certain thing, or, being devoted to a particular interest or activity HABIT was defined as a settled or regular tendency or practice!! This may sound drab, n my reader may wonder what I am heading to, but I have a point to make, n I hope you bear up wid me The definitions above are not complete, what about mental dependence? I come to the crux of the matter now!! SMOKING: is it an addiction or a habit? its not supposed to make u mentally dependent...but then ppl do behave lyk they r aft some tym...lyk i need a cig to think, to relieve ma tension!!...
2 comments
Read more