Skip to main content
i have always been an "individualist". i advocate rights of a person as an individual, not on race, religion, sex, nationality, representation etc.. but what's on my mind now, myt sound lyk an exception..though its not.

a long time back i had read this article in the newspaper it was this insight into future kind of thing. i don remember much of the things..but broadly it was about predicting how the world with cloning would be. how it would be pocble merely for the females to take over the reproduction, n males would become irrelevant in the society( in a biological perspective). somewher ther was this mention...that there are no males....there are only "superfemales"( he he he..)

so our society now divides into females n superfemales...guys please note!!!

a woman is "a world" in herself..cos she holds the keys to the world that will be tomorrow. it may b possible to have a world devoid of men, but not without women. men world over need to realise this. its not about proving them down..its not about superiority.....its about respect.

do we, women, get the respect we deserve? each person has his own dignity, u do , n so do I; guys hav n so do gals.

living in this world of today where being moral is not one of the " most coolest " thing to do.. i think i m not the only person wondering!!!
Labels:

Comments

Anonymous said…
how true..it's not about superiority, it's about respect..usually women are "objects"..either to be shown off, or to be owned and commanded..and these thought are not old and outdated..they apply as much to my generation as they did to the previous
October 19, 2007 at 9:23 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

अजुन माझे चुकले - माकले शब्द तुला टोचत असतील सावलीमध्ये कधी चुकून क्षण ओले भिजवत असतील पाउस म्हणून , वेड्या मनाची समजूत ही , तू घालत असशील मी नसले तरी कधी , चोरून, स्वप्न माझी पाहत असशील नसेन मी , पण हरवलेली प्रीत माझी खरी आहे एक डाव फसला , म्हणून आयुष्यभराची दूरी आहे
Post a Comment
Read more

Trade-off

Trade-offs. used this term a couple o times couple o places. Dint think i d b using it in lifE as such. There's always a trade-off , between what's in your hand at right now, and what u wanna hold. Between what u can do, and what u wanna do. Between ur heart and ur head. Should there be? if we are a single entity, should what we feel be different from what we live? shouldn't life be bound by one philosophy, a single thought that runs through you, and reflects in everything that you do? Should there be a trade-off between being happy and making someone happy? Shouldn't it be the same? i can't understand compromises. I cant understand giving up something for something else. There cant be something less and something more... its either something o nothing. i cant understand why we sometimes fake ourselves. or we drift to believe that we are something else. why is inactivity so elusive? What can be achieved from endless conversations tat lead nowhere, head nowhere? Why ...
11 comments
Read more

smoke off yer life

Its been some time since my last post…..but I was preoccupied with other matters… Back to ma writin What is the difference between addiction n habit…if any!! The first thing that I turned to for an answer was a dictionary! In the GREAT DICTIONARY (no adjective, the dictionary I refer is itself called the GREAT DICTIONARY…nt oxford, m a bit unorthodox) i found this: ADDICTED is defined as being physically dependant on a certain thing, or, being devoted to a particular interest or activity HABIT was defined as a settled or regular tendency or practice!! This may sound drab, n my reader may wonder what I am heading to, but I have a point to make, n I hope you bear up wid me The definitions above are not complete, what about mental dependence? I come to the crux of the matter now!! SMOKING: is it an addiction or a habit? its not supposed to make u mentally dependent...but then ppl do behave lyk they r aft some tym...lyk i need a cig to think, to relieve ma tension!!...
2 comments
Read more